Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 631.111
The article considers the scientific problem of balancing the system of strategic planning for the development of the agricultural sector, the compliance of the level of planned work with new tasks in the field of providing the population with affordable products and achieving rational consumption standards. The purpose of the article is to substantiate modern approaches and methods of strategizing the agricultural sector that contribute to enhancing the convergence of physical and economic availability of products. When assessing the suitability of strategic approaches, we proceeded from the need to implement planning procedures at the industry (federal) and territorial levels. It was revealed that of those proposed by science and tested in practice, the most significant, taking into account the current realities, are the program-target, object-oriented, project and foresight approaches. The possibilities of their comprehensive application in the process of forming strategies and implementing programs in agriculture are shown. Scientific developments are useful for participants in strategic planning for preparing management decisions in the process of forecasting and planning the socio-economic development of the agricultural sector as a basic area for providing the population with affordable and high-quality products.
strategizing the agricultural sector, sectoral planning, territorial planning, strategic approaches, integrated approach, physical accessibility of products, economic accessibility of products
1. Aganbegyan A.G. Dlya vyhoda iz stagnacii nuzhny korennye izmeneniya // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ekonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2019. № 217 (3). S. 28-39.
2. Bauer V.P., Smirnov V.V. Proektnoe upravlenie i komplaens-strategirovanie riskov realizacii nacional'nyh proektov: koncepciya i analiz // Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost'. 2021. T. 4. № 2. S. 227-246.
3. Bespahotnyy G.V. Programmno-celevoe planirovanie i proektnoe upravlenie v sel'skom hozyaystve // Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tehnike, prirode i obschestve. 2018. № 2 (26). C. 3-15.
4. Boyko A.N. Gosudarstvennoe strategicheskoe upravlenie: prioritetnaya model' s centralizovannoy sistemnoy organizaciey // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2019. № 9. S. 52-64.
5. Vernikov V.A. Sovremennye podhody strategicheskogo planirovaniya razvitiya proizvodstvennyh struktur v sovremennyh usloviyah // Ekonomika vysokotehnologichnyh proizvodstv. 2023. T. 4. № 3. S. 181-196.
6. Gromov E., Gerasimov A., Lelikova E. Sovremennye tendencii formirovaniya regional'nyh i municipal'nyh programm razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva i sel'skih territoriy // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2019. № 12. S. 87-96.
7. Zhilyakov D.I., Petrushina O.V. Razrabotka modeli i metodiki ocenki effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya razvitiya sel'skogo hozyaystva // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. T. 15. № 4 (75). S. 169-179.
8. Zavgorodnyaya A.S., Vorozheykina T.M. Primenenie scenarnyh podhodov k obosnovaniyu vybora napravleniy povysheniya effektivnosti funkcionirovaniya rastenievodcheskogo podkompleksa // Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyaystva Rossii. 2023. № 4. S. 100-105.
9. Kvartal'nye indeksy potrebitel'skih cen na tovary i uslugi. Rezhim dostupa: https://rosstat.gov.ru/ (data obrascheniya: 28.05.2024).
10. Kuznecov V.V., Holodova M.A. Faktory disbalansa sovremennoy sistemy strategicheskogo planirovaniya razvitiya agrarnogo sektora // APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2023. № 8. S. 66-75.
11. Kyshtymova E.A., Medik D.O. Strategicheskiy menedzhment: sovremennye koncepcii // Simvol nauki. 2017. № 2 (1). S. 82-84.
12. Magomedov R.Sh. Programmno-celevoe byudzhetirovanie v Rossiyskoy Federacii: regional'nyy aspekt // Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. 2018. № 11. S. 323-330.
13. Miroshnikov S.N. Primenenie proektnogo podhoda v ramkah sistemy strategicheskogo planirovaniya regional'nogo razvitiya // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. 2019. № 11. S. 92-100.
14. Nepogodina A.V. Forsayt kak metodologiya predvideniya // Molodoy uchenyy. 2020. № 2 (292). S. 290-291.
15. Osipov V.A., Krasova E.V., Vichkovskiy N.A. Sovremennye podhody k strategicheskomu upravleniyu na predpriyatii v usloviyah neopredelennosti // Liderstvo i menedzhment. 2022. № 4. S. 1015-1032.
16. Real'nye raspolagaemye denezhnye dohody naseleniya po Rossiyskoy Federacii. Rezhim dostupa: https://rosstat.gov.ru/ (data obrascheniya: 28.05.2024).
17. Reshetnikova E.G. Ekonomicheskaya dostupnost' prodovol'stviya: instrumenty obespecheniya v usloviyah novyh vyzovov // Ekonomika i upravlenie. 2020. T. 26. № 2. S. 128-136.
18. Ruschickaya O.A., Voronina Ya.V., Fateeva N.B., Petrova L.N., Petrov Yu.A. Aktual'nye napravleniya obespecheniya kachestva i ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti produktov pitaniya // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2016. № 2 (144). S. 80-92.
19. Samygin D.Yu. Principy strategicheskogo planirovaniya sel'skogo hozyaystva s uchetom zadach i vyzovov prodovol'stvennoy bezopasnosti // Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tehnike, prirode i obschestve. 2021. № 1. C. 50-59.
20. Semin A.N. Territorial'noe razvitie regiona v usloviyah proektnogo upravleniya i klasternoy ekonomiki // ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika. 2019. № 3. S. 25-38.
21. Suhacheva V.I., Smotrova T.I. O forsayt-tehnologiyah i sferah ih primeneniya na urovne regional'nogo upravleniya // Sovremennaya ekonomika: problemy i resheniya. 2023. 5 (161). S. 31-49.
22. Schennikov V.P., Ravochkin N.N. Scenarnoe planirovanie i upravlenie proektami kak napravleniya obnovleniya metodologii upravleniya v sel'skom hozyaystve // Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke. 2016. № 4. S. 130-138.
