Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 631.4
Arable land can have different degrees of fertility contrast within the same agricultural field. One of the reasons for the formation of highly contrasting soil cover structures (HCSPS) is the different depths of the Permian deposits underlying the Quaternary deposits. HCSPS on alternating Quaternary and Permian deposits are common in the Republics of Tatarstan and Bashkortostan, as well as in the Orenburg, Samara, and Ulyanovsk regions. The development of methods for processing large amounts of remote sensing data (LSDD) using neural networks (construction of a multitime soil line) allows for the detection of the spread of VKSFP in large areas with the detail of precision farming systems. The distribution of different crop yields coincides spatially with the VKSFP and is determined by the contrasting properties of the soil cover. The greatest differences in crop yields were observed for sunflower, with a variation of more than 2.5 times from one fertility zone to another. The circular pattern of the VKSFP and the repeated alternation of rings can only be exploited to increase the productivity of the territory through the use of precision farming systems based on remote sensing data.
soil cover structure, big data, multi-temporal soil line, precision agriculture
1. Kukutai A. Can Digital Farming Deliver on its Promise. 2016. URL: http://www.agnewscenter.com/archives.cfm?news=9903
2. Fridland V.M. Struktura pochvennogo pokrova. M.: Mysl', 1972. 423 s.
3. Skryabina O.A. Struktura pochvennogo pokrova, metody ee izucheniya. Perm': Permskaya GSHA, 2008. 151 s.
4. Johnson W.M. The pedon and polypedon // Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings. 1963. V. 27, pp. 212-215.
5. Webster, R. Fundamental objections to the 7th Approximation. // Journal of Soil Science. 1968. V. 19(2), pp. 354–366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1968.tb01546.x
6. Kozlovskiy F.I. Pochvennyy individuum i metody ego opredeleniya. Zakonomernosti prostranstvennogo var'irovaniya svoystv pochv i informacionno-statisticheskie metody ih izucheniya. M.: Nauka, 1970. S. 42-59.
7. Simakova M.S. Pochvennye karty. Kartograficheskaya izuchennost' Rossii (topograficheskie i tematicheskie karty): RAN; Institut geografii. Moskva, 1999. S. 113-133.
8. Kulyanitsa A.L., Rukhovich D.I., Koroleva P.V., Vilchevskaya E.V., Kalinina N.V. Analysis of the informativity of big satellite precision-farming data processing for correcting large-scale soil maps. Eurasian Soil Science. 2020. V. 53(12), pp. 1709-1725. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320110083
9. Kiryushin V.I. Upravlenie plodorodiem pochv i produktivnost'yu agrocenozov v adaptivno-landshaftnyh sistemah zemledeliya // Pochvovedenie. 2019. № 9, S. 1130-1139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032180X19070062
10. Belousov A.A., Belousova E.N. Vliyanie vnutripol'noy neodnorodnosti pochvennogo plodorodiya na vybor elementov metodiki polevogo opyta // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2013. № 6(81), S. 55-62.
11. Wollenhaupt N.C., Wolkowski R.P. Grid soil sampling // Better Crops. 1994. V. 78(4), pp. 6-9.
12. Yang C., Anderson G.L. Airborne Videography to Identify Spatial Plant Growth Variability for Grain Sorghum // Precision Agriculture 1, 67-79 (1999). http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009917617316
13. Hong S.Y., Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Drummond S.T., Palm H.L., Wiebold W.J. Estimating within-field variation in soil properties from airborne hyperspectral images // Pecora 15/Land Satellite Information IV/ISPRS Commission I/FIEOS 2002 Conference Proceeding. 2002. http://www.isprs.org/commission1/proceedings02/paper/00025.pdf
14. Robert P.C. (1982). Evaluation of some remote sensing techniques for soil and crop management. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.
15. Ziliani M.G., Altaf M.U., Aragon B., Houborg R., Franz T. E., Lu Y., Sheffield J., Hoteit I., McCabe M. F. Intra-field crop yield variability by assimilating CubeSat LAI in the APSIM crop model. // Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2022. XLIII-B3-2022, pp. 1045–1052. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-1045-2022
16. Samsonova V.P., Meshalkina J.L., Blagoveschensky Y.N., Yaroslavtsev A.M., Stoorvogel J.J. The role of positional errors while interpolating soil organic carbon contents using satellite imagery. // Precision Agric. 2018. 19, pp. 1085–1099. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-9575-4
17. Bento N.L., Silva Ferraz G.A., Santana L.S., de Oliveira Faria R., da Silva Amorim J., de Lourdes Oliveira e Silva M., Silva M.M.A., Alonso D.J.C. Soil compaction mapping by plant height and spectral responses of coffee in multispectral images obtained by remotely piloted aircraft system. // Precision Agric. 2024. 25, pp. 729-750. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-023-10090-0
18. Liu P., Di L., Du Q., Wang L. Remote Sensing Big Data: Theory, Methods and Applications. // Remote Sensing. 2018. V. 10(5), 711. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050711
19. Rukhovich D.I., Koroleva P.V., Rukhovich D.D., Rukhovich A.D., Recognition of the bare soil using deep machine learning methods to create maps of arable soil degradation based on the analysis of multi-temporal remote sensing data. // Remote Sensing. 2022. V. 14(9), 2224. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092224
20. Nomenklatura i taksonomiya osnovnyh tipov pochv Respubliki Tatarstan / Sost. A.A. Shinkarev, A.V. Gusarov, K.G. Giniyatullin, L.V. Mel'nikov, M.K. Latypov. Kazan': Izdatel'stvo Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2008. 32 s.
