Russian Federation
Russian Federation
UDC 502.5
UDC 502.6
The article describes the approach for preliminary assessing the physical-geographic, socio-economic, cultural-historical and ecological conditions for recreation and tourism development in small river valleys on the example of the macroregion – Central Economic Region, Russian Federation. Small rivers and their valleys are vulnerable elements of the river network, at the same time there are a few studies on small watercourses in the tourist-recreational aspect in the Russian geoecological science. Methods of remote-sensing, quantitative assessment of recreation and tourism resources, point-rating assessment are used. Final result of the work – zoning of possible tourist and recreational pressure based on publicly available data. Moscow, Vladimir, Ivanovo, Yaroslavl and Tula Regions – the main area with the most unfavorable conditions, Bryansk Region is the separate border area. Tourist and recreational complexes mostly located on the territories with low and medium population density, at the same time 57% located inside the good transport accessibility. Simultaneous development of urban and rural tourism, river’s role in urban blue-green infrastructure, location to customers of tourist services, environmental pollution are considered as the most important criteria for the geoecological research. 8 small river valleys and related urban settlements are identified by these criteria. Identified territories are characterized by expressed signs of the ecological tourist and recreational cluster, functioning of which depends on small river valley’s geoecological problems.
small river valleys, tourist and recreational activities, preliminary assessment, macroregion, Central Economic Region, blue-green infrastructure, tourist and recreational cluster, ecological tourist and recreational cluster
1. Andreeva I.V., Rotanova I.N. Municipal'naya turistsko-rekreacionnaya sistema: geoekologicheskoe soprovozhdenie planirovaniya i razvitiya // Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya. 2012. № 6. S. 455-459.
2. Ahromeev L.M., Sharapaev I.V. Klasternyy podhod k perspektivam razvitiya turizma v Bryanskoy oblasti. Geograficheskie problemy sbalansirovannogo razvitiya staroosvoennyh regionov: Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoy zaochnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. 2017. S. 6-9.
3. Bokuchava D.D., Borodina T.L., Vinogradova V.V., Glezer O.B., Zolotokrylin A.N., Sokolov I.A., Titkova T.B., Cherenkova E.A., Shiryaeva A.V. Prirodno-klimaticheskie usloviya i social'no-geograficheskoe prostranstvo Rossii. M.: IG RAN, 2018. 154 s.
4. Vertinskaya T.S., Klicunova V.A. Metodologiya sozdaniya regional'nyh turisticheskih klasterov v Belarusi. Minsk: Biblioteka sel'skogo turizma, 2014. 52 s.
5. Kozlov M.A. Turistsko-rekreacionnyy klaster: ponyatie i osnovnye teoretiko-metodologicheskie harakteristiki // Strategiya ustoychivogo razvitiya regionov. 2016. № . S. 150-159.
6. Kolbovskiy E.Yu. Landshaftovedenie. M.: Academia, 2006. 480 c.
7. Komarova M.E. Kompleksnaya geoekologicheskaya ocenka turistsko-rekreacionnogo potenciala staroosvoennogo regiona: na primere Belgorodskoy oblasti: Avtoref. diss. … kand. geogr. nauk. Belgorod: 2009. 22 s.
8. Podrubnyy D.G. Zarubezhnyy opyt geografo-ekologicheskih issledovaniy dolin malyh rek dlya turistsko-rekreacionnyh celey. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya turizma: regional'nyy aspekt: Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, 28 aprelya 2023 g., Groznyy. 2023. S. 172-175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.36684/92-1-2023-172-175
9. Potencial'naya ustoychivost' landshaftov. Nacional'nyy Atlas Rossii. URL: http://nationalatlas.ru/tom2/419.html (data obrascheniya: 03.09.23).
10. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 29.07.2014 N 1398-p (red. Ot 21.01.2020) Ob utverzhdenii perechnya monoprofil'nyh municipal'nyh obrazovaniy Rossiyskoy Federacii (monogorodov). Spravochno-informacionnaya sistema «Konsul'tantPlyus». URL: http://consultant.ru/documents/cons_doc_LAW_166540/d56f021d0894f510308e6cdf0d8f0640de141068/ (data obrascheniya: 10.09.23).
11. Chislennost' postoyannogo naseleniya Rossiyskoy Federacii po municipal'nym obrazovaniyam na 1 yanvarya 2023 goda. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki. URL: http://showdata.gks.ru/report/278928 (data obrascheniya: 03.09.23).
12. Anderson E.P., et al. Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environment water management. WIREs Water 2019. Vol. 6. № 6. e1381. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1381
13. Colvin S.A.R., et al. Headwater streams and Wetlands are Critical for sustaining Fish, Fisheries, and Ecosystem Services / S.A.R. Colvin // Fisheries. 2019. Vol. 44. №2. P. 73-91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10229
14. Otero I., Ezquerra A., Navarra M., Sendra P. Model for determining the load or carrying capacity of rivers and riverbanks for recreational use. Estudios Geograficos, 2015, vol. 76, no. 279, pp. 633-670. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3989/estgeogr.201523
15. Palmer M., et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration / M. Palmer // Journal of Applied Ecology. 2005. Vol. 42. P. 208-217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x
16. Vian F.D., Izquierdo J.J.P., Martinez M.S. (2021). River-city recreational interaction: A classification of urban riverfront parks and walks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 59, 127042. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042
