employee from 01.01.2020 until now
UDC 338
This article is devoted to the application of the flexible (Agile) methodologies to the practice of public administration. First of all, the author talks about using such practice in the Russian government bodies. The purpose of the article is to reveal the specifics of the process of adapting flexible management methodologies in the public sphere, including the management experience that has already been accumulated in the private sector. The article reveals such a problem as the impossibility of directly transferring the practice of applying flexible methodologies from the private sector to the public one. Firstly, in view of the fact that at the moment in the public sector the former model of management still dominates. Secondly, for the reason that a significant part of civil servants are not psychologically ready to work in the conditions that presuppose Agile technologies. The article proposes to strive to gradually develop the original Russian standard for flexible control technologies. Such a standard should generalize the already existing Russian management experience, and also take into account the restrictions and frameworks that legislation imposes on the management process. The novelty of the article lies in the fact that it indicates the specific characteristics of all the main flexible management methodologies that can and cannot be adapted in the conditions of Russian public administration.
flexible management methodologies, Agile, management, public administration, municipal government
1. Abramov, R.A., Muhaev, R.T., Sokolov, M.S. Kriterii effektivnosti gosudarstvennogo i regional'nogo upravleniya v kontekste proektnogo podhoda // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika. №1. 2017. S. 96-113.
2. Altuhova, N.F., Vasil'eva, E.V., Slavin, B.B. Koncepciya novogo podhoda k upravleniyu proektami v deyatel'nosti gosudarstvennyh sluzhaschih // Biznes-informatika. №4. 2016. S. 60-69.
3. Ganieva, A.A. Proektnyy podhod v gosudarstvennom upravlenii // Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. №2. 2009. S. 107-110.
4. Ivanov, O.B., Buhval'd, E.M. Nacional'nye proekty Rossii: regional'noe izmerenie // ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika. №1. 2019. S. 37-52.
5. Karimov, R.A., Kachkynbekov, N.R. Nekotorye aspekty gibkoy metodologii razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. №3. 2018. S. 199-203.
6. Leksin, V.I., Porfir'ev. B.N. Problemy i perspektivy ispol'zovaniya proektnogo podhoda v upravlenii razvitiem rossiyskoy Arktiki // MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie). 2015. S. 11-20.
7. Ivanov, I.Yu., Barmashova, S.A. Ispol'zovanie gibkih metodologiy v gosudarstvennom upravlenii cifrovizaciey // Sbornik tezisov vystupleniy Chetvertoy mezhdunarodnoy konferencii «Upravlenie biznesom v cifrovoy ekonomike». Sankt-Peterburg. 2021. – S. 457-463.
8. Maguza, A.O. Gibkie metody v gosudarstvennom upravlenii: novyy vzglyad na Agile-metodologiyu // Sbornik nauchnyh statey « Gosudarstvennoe administrirovanie i gosudarstvennaya sluzhba: vchera, segodnya, zavtra v usloviyah elektronnogo pravitel'stva i cifrovoy ekonomiki». 2019. S. 509-515
9. Horpyakov, P.S. Ispol'zovanie gibkih metodologiy v upravlenii obrazovatel'noy organizacii // Izvestiya instituta pedagogiki i psihologii obrazovaniya. №1. 2021. S. 11-16.
10. Umerenkov, D. I., Dmitriev A.G. Kriterii vybora gibkoy metodologii dlya IT-proekta / D. I. Umerenkov, A. G. Dmitriev // Vestnik Akademii. – 2022. – № 4. – S. 71-80. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.51409/v.a.2022.12.04.009. – EDN WADCMC.
11. Al'muhametov, A. I., Dmitriev A.G. Gibkie metodologii upravleniya proektami / A. I. Al'muhametov, A. G. Dmitriev // Uchenye zapiski Rossiyskoy Akademii predprinimatel'stva. – 2023. – T. 22, № 2. – S. 11-17. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2023-22-2-11-17. – EDN ICFWBT.
12. Nigmatullin, R. K., Dmitriev A.G. Gibkie, klassicheskie i gibridnye metodologii upravleniya proektami: preimuschestva i nedostatki / R. K. Nigmatullin, A. G. Dmitriev // Putevoditel' predprinimatelya. – 2023. – T. 16, № 2. – S. 70-78. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.24182/2073-9885-2023-16-2-70-78. – EDN KILNDB.
13. Dmitriev, A. G. Analiz metodologiy razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya s cel'yu vozmozhnosti primeneniya standarta PMBOK k upravleniyu it-proektami / A. G. Dmitriev // Integraciya i differenciaciya nauki i praktiki v kontekste prioritetnyh paradigm razvitiya civilizacii : sbornik nauchnyh statey po itogam nacional'noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 23–24 oktyabrya 2020 goda. – Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy ekonomicheskiy universitet, 2020. – S. 204-206. – EDN MUHONU.
14. Yunusova, E.V. Razvitie rossiĭskoĭ ekonomiki v usloviyah nauchno-tehnicheskogo progressa: rol' gosudarstva // Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta kooperacii. №2. 2019. S. 95-100.
15. Yanovskiy, V.V., Isaev, A.P., Nescheret, A.K. O realizacii proektnogo podhoda v gosudarstvennom upravlenii i mestnom samoupravlenii // Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie. №7. 2018. S. 8-17.
16. Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 161-165.
17. Soe, R. M., & Drechsler, W. (2018). Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 323-335.
18. Ribeiro, A., & Domingues, L. (2018). Acceptance of an agile methodology in the public sector. Procedia computer science, 138, 621-629.
